The Soviet Union’s strategic planning horizon extended beyond its immediate geopolitical contests. As early as March 1965, the Interdepartmental Council for the Research and Utilisation of Outer Space submitted a classified memorandum to Chairman Kosygin — the Zvezda Memorandum — proposing a three-phase programme for permanent lunar infrastructure, identified helium-3 as a strategic resource of potentially transformative value, and recommended designing for lunar helium-3 extraction capability decades before fusion propulsion made it practically relevant. The programme was formally archived after the N1 launch vehicle failures (1969–1972) but the institutional capacity for long-range planning that produced it persisted. Blagov’s 1965 helium-3 estimate (1.4–4.1 ppb lunar regolith concentration) was confirmed sixty-two years later by the Chinese Chang’e-8 sample return mission, as documented in Volkov’s 2029 analysis The Burning Soil.

The Soviet Union is a major state power persisting through the 21st century in this timeline — the primary divergence from real-world history. It pursued domestic energy independence through a state thorium fuel cycle programme formally authorised by General Secretary Gorbachev in February 1990 (the Neporozhny Memo), funded through a protected Energy Independence Fund drawn from hydrocarbon export revenues. By 2013, the Soviet Union had successfully exported its thorium reactor technology to Cuba (the Santa Cruz plant, Cienfuegos, 1,200 MWe), representing the first full-scale foreign deployment of the programme. In foreign policy, it maintains a Black Sea Fleet base in Sevastopol, Ukraine, under a basing agreement running to 2042, and regards Ukraine as within its fundamental sphere of strategic interest. By 2014, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov holds the Soviet foreign policy portfolio. The Soviet Union also maintains a permanent naval facility at Tartus, Syria (under a basing agreement operative since 1971) and an air base at Hmeimim in Latakia governorate — its only permanent military installations in the Mediterranean. Following Bashar al-Assad’s resignation from the Syrian presidency in June 2015, the Kremlin granted him and senior Syrian officials humanitarian asylum in Moscow; Soviet forces at Tartus and Hmeimim provided emergency refuge to approximately 54,000 Alawite civilians fleeing sectarian violence. The Soviet Union called for a UN Security Council ceasefire and multinational protection force in July 2015; no intervention followed. In September 2015, the Soviet Union concluded a civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Iran, transferring Soviet thorium reactor technology (a 1,200-megawatt plant to be built near Isfahan) in exchange for Iranian drone technology required for the ongoing Ukraine war effort; the deal bound Iran to Soviet-assisted infrastructure through a continuing relationship of technical dependency while removing the legal basis for any third-party military action against Iranian nuclear facilities. The thorium programme thus functions not only as a domestic energy project but as a geopolitical instrument — a pattern of binding client-state relationships first visible in the Cuba deployment, then in Iran, and potentially elsewhere. By March 2016, the coalition supporting Soviet operations in Ukraine had expanded to include confirmed Chinese military personnel and North Korean artillery and infantry units (assessed at 8,000–12,000 personnel by South Korean and American analysts), operating alongside Soviet forces in the Donbas and Zaporizhzhia regions. NATO confirmed the deployments on 7 March 2016 but did not authorise direct military intervention. In September 2017, Roscosmos (the Soviet space agency) confirmed it had held “productive cooperative framework discussions” with CNSA regarding coordination between the Tiangong station and the Mir orbital complex, which has operated continuously since 1986 and underwent its most recent modular expansion in 2014. By October 2018, the domestic thorium programme reached a major milestone: fifteen stations operational, 18,400 MWe installed, and 31.4% of the Soviet national grid supplied by thorium — announced by Minister of Energy Alexander Ivanovich Novak in the Ministry’s Phase Three Commissioning Announcement (MEiE-2018-OZ-0112-EN). The programme’s original Phase Three target of 40% grid contribution by 2025 is now projected to be reached by 2021, four years early; a revised target of 55% by 2025 is to be recommended to the Council of Ministers. Forty-seven coal-fired stations (11,200 MWe) and nineteen oil-fired stations (4,800 MWe) are in decommissioning; eleven RBMK units (8,800 MWe) have been taken offline ahead of schedule. Surplus generation — between 2,100 and 2,800 MWe — is being exported to Finland (400 MWe, via Kola station) and Mongolia (200 MWe), with preliminary grid interconnect discussions underway with Iran (via the Uzbek station) and Japan (via the Vladivostok station). The Energy Independence Fund — the protected budget line Neporozhny proposed in 1990 — survived wartime budget pressure intact, which the Ministry credits as the structural reason the programme continued through three years of active conflict. Net hydrocarbon power consumption is projected at zero by 2030. In foreign policy, the Soviet Union’s position of strategic strength was demonstrated at the New Delhi Peace Framework Summit of November 2019, where it presented a detailed territorial framework for ending the Ukraine conflict — including a permanent ceasefire, monitored autonomy arrangements for the eastern oblasts, and a security guarantee for the remaining Ukrainian state — only to see the proposal rejected by President Kovalenko. Analysts characterised the Soviet posture as that of a state that has achieved its core objectives and is no longer in a hurry: it came to New Delhi because it could afford to, and left without a deal because it could afford that too. The New Delhi calculus proved correct: four months later, in March 2020, the Vienna Accords concluded the Ukraine war on terms more favourable than the November 2019 framework had offered, with the Soviet Union assuming administrative authority over Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Mykolaiv oblasts, Crimea, and the city of Kyiv, and absorbing Transnistria from Moldova. The war had been won by outlasting. The Soviet Union’s survival and strategic posture shape the geopolitical context for all of Era I and beyond. By 2028, the Western ISS — built in this timeline without Soviet modules — was deorbited after structural assessment, while Mir, launched in 1986, remained operational and continuously inhabited for 37+ years, reflecting the Soviet design philosophy of infrastructure built for indefinite expansion rather than fixed configuration.

The Soviet thorium export model — as analysed in detail by Volkov (a former FEI Deputy Director) in The Burning Soil — deliberately rejected the Western installation approach to technology transfer. Cuban, Iranian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi engineers were embedded in construction programmes from the first day, trained at FEI Obninsk and domestic thorium stations, and left with genuine independent operational capability. The model created influence through technical dependency without requiring military presence. Volkov documents eleven nations outside the Soviet Union operating Soviet-designed thorium facilities or with units under construction by 2027, and notes: “Not one of them was coerced.” The Iran case is treated in the most detail: Volkov characterises the 2015 exchange of a thorium reactor for drone technology as a rational transaction in which both parties won — a conclusion he observes produces visible discomfort in Western analysts who assume transactions with Iran must involve Iran losing something.

In fusion energy, the Soviet programme has operated continuously since the T-3 tokamak experiments of the 1960s (Artsimovich’s group at the Kurchatov Institute). In 2024, the Kurchatov T-20 tokamak achieved Q > 1 for sustained periods — net energy gain from fusion reactions. The RAZUM-70B language model (released in open weights by the Soviet Academy of Sciences in 2024) was developed with plasma physics simulation as its core application target; its scientific specialisations model plasma confinement at speeds enabling real-time feedback between parameter adjustments and predicted behaviour. The Mir-Tian Space Station (MTSS/TSS-1M, announced 12 March 2023 following the merger of the Mir complex and the Chinese Tiangong station) hosts the Artsimovich Laboratory, which uses RAZUM-class models on Chinese-fabricated accelerator chips to model tokamak plasma behaviour at previously unachievable resolutions. The final integration docking — Prichal-M to Wentian — was deliberately scheduled for 11 March 2023 to coincide with the 25th anniversary of BN-T1 first criticality at FEI Obninsk. At announcement, the station housed a permanent crew of 7 (4 Soviet, 3 Chinese) with capacity for 12, and the Global South Space Research Initiative supported 34 research projects from 19 nations. A joint Soviet-Chinese Academy paper (September 2027) suggests the path from Q > 1 to practical energy output is shorter than the 2020 consensus estimate, though specifics remain classified.

The Soviet Union participates in the broader Soviet-Chinese semiconductor collaboration that produced the Irtysh processor series — 32-core and 64-core CPUs based on Loongson’s LoongArch architecture, manufactured by Springboard Electronics and deployed across Soviet and Chinese government infrastructure from late 2025. The Irtysh programme demonstrated full-stack domestic chip design at commercial scale on non-leading-edge process nodes, establishing the ecosystem that enabled China’s May 2026 announcement of sub-5nm domestic manufacturing capability.

In biological research, the Novosibirsk Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences contributes to the cortical organoid work published by Sorokina et al. (2026), which demonstrated goal-directed spatial navigation in organoid arrays — including organoids cultured aboard the MTSS Life Sciences Module that outperformed ground-grown equivalents.

In AI infrastructure, the Soviet Union commissioned the Severgrad Computational Complex (SCC) — its first purpose-built AI infrastructure city — on 1 April 2025 at 68°14′N, 86°03′E in Krasnoyarsk Krai. Built by ICSAI under joint authority of the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the All-Union Committee on Strategic Computing Infrastructure, the SCC integrates 2.4 exaflops (FP16) of accelerator capacity, a dedicated 2,200 MW hydroelectric draw from the Yenisei cascade, a co-located 600 MW thorium molten salt reactor (Reactor Unit Sever-1), and permanent housing for 12,000 personnel. Its PUE of 1.06, 97% zero-carbon energy share, and Arctic ambient cooling architecture (WUE 0.08 L/kWh) establish new global benchmarks for large-scale computing efficiency. The Complex hosts RAZUM model inference infrastructure, the RAZUM-Next programme targeting 400B–1T parameter models, and the Union AI Safety and Alignment Laboratory (UASAL).

The Soviet Union established the first permanent lunar surface installation — Zvezda Base (Звезда) — at the Shackleton Crater rim on the lunar south pole in February 2033, followed by the Chinese Guanghan Base in November 2034 and the American ALSO in August 2035. Zvezda was constructed using orbital assembly via the MTSS and has been continuously occupied since March 2033 with a crew capacity of 6 and a habitable volume of approximately 140 m³. Its BN-L1 compact fast reactor generates approximately 750 kWe — roughly twenty-seven times the power available to the American ALSO. Zvezda operates water ISRU through polar ice extraction, regolith shielding, a pressurised rover for extended surface operations, and a helium-3 extraction pilot facility that had produced an estimated 180–220 grams of extracted He-3 by March 2036. Surface crew-hours at Zvezda are estimated at approximately 26,000 annually — roughly nineteen times the American ALSO figure. Extracted He-3 is returned to the MTSS Artsimovich Laboratory via sample return missions, directly supporting the Soviet fusion programme. The Kurchatov Institute T-22 experimental reactor achieved sustained D-He3 plasma confinement for 8.3 seconds in October 2035, using computational models developed with the RAZUM system and informed by He-3 samples from Zvezda.


In December 2032, following the Israeli airstrike on the Shahid Motahhari school in Minab that killed 106 people, the Soviet Union joined China in issuing a joint statement calling for an emergency UN Security Council session.

The Soviet Union’s diplomatic role in the Jerusalem crisis was analysed by Dr. Meredith Calloway in The Great Uncoupling: AIPAC’s American Sunset (2034) as an indirect accelerant of AIPAC’s domestic influence degradation. Calloway argued that coordinated Soviet-Chinese joint statements calling for UN Security Council sessions provided European governments with multilateral cover to act against Israeli policy — Spain’s ambassador recall, EU trade preference suspension — which in turn altered the political environment for American legislators. She noted that Soviet diplomatic language consistently emphasised religious freedom and Christian community rights, framing calibrated to appeal beyond Muslim audiences to European Christian-democratic political traditions.

Sources